The 3rd Birthday

Players: 1 Offline Player
Publisher: Square-Enix
Genres: Third-Person Shooter
Release Date: March 29, 2011
Developer: HexaDrive
MSRP: $29.99
Platforms:
Hideous creatures descend on Manhattan. The only means of fighting them off is a new science called the Overdive system, but only one viable candidate exists -- Aya Brea. Fend off new enemies called the Twisted in this 3rd person shooter.

time to play the original before you play the 3rd (birthday).

In 1998 Squaresoft (that’s right, not Square-Enix) released a survival-horror title named Parasite Eve, based on a japanese novel of the same name. The gameplay was dubbed by many as “Resident Evil meets Final Fantasy” for its survival horror aspects and RPG customization. The game was big enough to warrant a sequel and is now making its way on to the North American PlayStation Network. The game has been rated by the ESRB for the PS3 and PSP and is also being published by Sony. If Sony was smart, they would release it before 3rd Birthday so gamers unfamiliar with the series can get the backstory of Aya Brea, but as of now there is no official release date.

Speaking of The 3rd Birthday, a new UK launch trailer has been released with English dubs and touting an April 1st release date (for the UK, not NA). It gives more insight to the story and also shows some mediocre lip-syncing. There isn’t as much gameplay as there is trailer fodder, but it’s worth checking out none the less.

What are your thoughts on the original Parasite Eve? Are you interested in picking up The 3rd Birthday?

Source: Siliconera

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube or email me at Taylor@blisteredthumbs.net. Also, feel free to leave a comment with suggestions about writing style, approach to coverage or anything else that might be on your mind.

avatar

Taylor Hoyt

Taylor’s love of the PSP flourished during his 1 year stay in South Korea. Whether it be on the subway, bus, or long walks on the beach, the PSP’s allure grew in Taylor’s heart. When he’s not playing games, he enjoys playing the guitar, making videos, and trying to learn the words to various KPOP songs. Favorite game of this generation: Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. Favorite game of all time: Persona 4.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

  1. February 27, 2011 at 01:34pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    If there’s one thing I’m sure I can say about all the Parasite Eve games, it’s that they aren’t what you would usually call “sane” RPG combinations and yet somehow wind up being incredibly good games.

    The original had a great story, and to this day the only thing I see bringing it down is what was graphically possible in 1996. That said, the “hot spot encounter” mechanic degenerated the game into a grind quickly.

    PE2 was actually an even better game. Admittedly, the engine is intentionally RE-like, but the auto-aim feature meant that it was DRASTICALLY more fluid and natural. Had PE2 been given voice acting and a soundtrack like the original, it would have easily bested the RE titles it copied. Unfortunately, we got wall-paper music, text-box dialogues, and FAR too many items until you replay in Bounty Hunter or Nightmare modes. Nothing about the game shined when a few tweaks would have made it a legend.

    Will I get this on PSN? Yes. PE is one of the few sci-fi evolution stories I actually like.

    Would I get PE2? Heck yes. I think rating it as just another RE clone is an egregious under-valuing, but I would also tell anyone looking at it to check gameplay out on youtube before getting it.

    3rd Birthday? It looks like it’ll have a ton of fanservice and, being on the PSP, won’t exactly be able to compete with console titles, but in the hopes of reviving one of my old favy series, I’m totally going to get it.

    • February 27, 2011 at 06:41pm
      In response to Egann
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      But PE2 doesn’t have a good storyline to start with… So even though I really welcome your suggestions for making the game better. I disagree that only that additions would’ve maked it a legend.

      The gameplay itself for instance was very slow & entering in “Battle Mode” didn’t help either.
      Switching targets was a pain in the ass. & you can clearly see that on the training grounds at the beginning of the game.

      I think if they’ve wanted to make it more RE-Like they’ve should’ve took the engine into a more Dino Crisis 2 Fashion(Run while aiming, consistent & fluent movement speed). Because even in this PE you collect Points & Trade them for equipment.

      IMO PE should’ve sustained the Action RPG Aspects of the Original in order to make it a successful Franchise.

      Don’t get me wrong though, I still like the game, I’ve enjoyed it a lot back in the day.

      • February 27, 2011 at 07:27pm
        In response to topopox
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        (*shrug*) Of course PE2 didn’t have as good a story as the original. There’s not much getting around that.

        Part of the reason I like PE2 as much as I do is because I had just gotten off of playing and re-playing Resident Evil 2 when I picked it up…and it took PE2′s blatant copy of the engine for me to realize that Resident Evil tended to be hideous games (story, graphics, gameplay) that were totally dependent on a few environmental puzzles which all felt like they needed the Zelda-chime after solving…and used well-written “documents” to sell a horrific atmosphere. And before someone complains that I don’t understand RE, this realization came AFTER I had written a five page paper defending RE2 as a shining work of video-game literature.

        While PE2′s engine took me almost 30 hours to get used to (and I hate the shooting range, too,) after that, I was torching enemies left and right in one of the smoothest engines I think the PSX ever had. Perhaps the biggest proof, however, that PE2 is a massively under-rated game is that after playing it, I bought RE: Code Veronica and, after trying several times, couldn’t play it. I was a long-time player of the series, and to this day Code Veronica sits on my shelf unplayed. I had to wait until RE4 until I could actually like a series I liked again, and for completely different reasons.

  2. February 26, 2011 at 10:16pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    First game was awesome fun. Second game was a Resident Evil 2 clone. Third game i doubt i’ll play.

  3. February 26, 2011 at 06:54pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    As much as I want to get excited about PE3 I really can’t. PE1 was one of my favorite games of the PS1 era and I even went to great expense to acquire a copy of the game in near-mint condition relatively recently. PE2… meh. They went from Resident Evil meets Final Fantasy to Resident Evil period and, imo, much to the game’s detriment.

    The more I see of PE3, the more it starts to look like an RE4 clone. I freely admit I could be way off on this assumption but it is hard to say. On top of that, this is Square-enix, not Squaresoft, and Square-Enix has done nothing to earn the trust of the consumers lately. I can easily see them exhuming the PE corpse just to mangle it and bury it deeper.

    Also, if you aren’t an obsessive collector who likes to stare at their big case of shiny PS boxes, I strongly recommend getting PE1 when it shows up on the PSN.

    • February 27, 2011 at 12:20am
      In response to Sylveria
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Totally agreed, Although it didn’t suprised me that they’ve took the gameplay on this direction, looking at PE 2 it was the natural thing to do.

      PE1 had an amazing engine & amazing gameplay.
      PE2 was just weird, but a little fun. Storywise sucks, comparing it to PE1. I’ve complained a lot about it the first time, specially since the new cast of characters isn’t a particuarily good one.

      This game just looks fun & that’s it. Storywise it’s going to be apparently worse than PE2.

      But like you’ve said, Squeenix, isn’t Squaresoft.

  4. February 26, 2011 at 03:34pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I loved the first Parasite Eve, I never got around to playing the second one though I have always wanted to. I was exited to hear that they were making another one but so far I don’t like what I see. It just does not seem to look like PE or have the same feel as the originals did.

  5. February 26, 2011 at 03:32pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Jesus Christ the voice acting is so flat and bland. Leave it to Square to get somewhat competent actors and STILL botch the English dub. Oh well, I had a feeling that this game would hurt in more ways than one. At least PE1 will be out on PSN. Ahhh, the memories… :)

  6. February 26, 2011 at 02:13pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    misleading release date at the end it not till march.
    i already played the japanese one.
    cant wait for this one.

  7. February 26, 2011 at 10:24am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    OMG THE VOICE ACTING ROFLMAO.

    Nice to see another PS1 Gem getting a PSN release!

    I watched the movie too & I played both games multiple times… PE1 is a masterpiece gaming & storytelling IMO.
    PE2 is just a good game.

    Now regarding The 3rd Birthday, I’m not convinced one bit regarding the story.
    We’re now dealing with Time Traveling & Soul Exchanging…WTF?

    The Game seems to be a pretty fun Action Game, something like RE4 on steroids. XD

  8. February 26, 2011 at 03:35am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Will Parasite Eve 2 also get a PSN release? I know it’s not considered to be as good, but still…

    I also seem to be one of the few people that read the Parasite Eve novel. Does the game make any references to the novel, by any chance, considering the game is technically a sequel?

    Well, now to add this to the list of PS1 classics to download. If I can’t just find a disc copy of them, which I do prefer…

    • February 26, 2011 at 04:57am
      In response to OniYouji
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      The story of the novel is mentioned and summarized in dialog in the game. There was also a movie adaption of the novel made, which wasn’t too bad, but not really anything special. I’ve seen the movie but haven’t read the novel, so I can’t really comment on how true to the book the movie was.

  9. February 26, 2011 at 02:03am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I definitely want to give this one a shot big time….but I do need to beat the other 2 games first before I do go for it. X)

    In any case, am glad that Square’s coming back to this story and even with it being such a long time (skipped a generation release after all), it does show that there are times that even an older title can get, hopefully, the right kind of continuation/sequel.

  10. February 26, 2011 at 01:09am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I like the original Parasite Eve and finished it a few times but the parasite Eve 2 i love a lot more is possible due to the fact that I like the original Resident Evil on the ps1 so here I felt at home but with a nice bonuses such as the RPG elements)With regard to release of 3rd Birthday in the PSN, I think it will happen very soon, thanks to looming on the horizon NGP)

  11. February 26, 2011 at 12:30am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Parasite Eve was a weird mash-up of action and RPG, but I thought it was interesting and fun at the time, and the story intrigued me because I was a huge biology nerd back then.

    Now that the PSP is getting a price drop, I’m more likely to get the 3rd Birthday along with the few other gems the PSP has to offer.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The 3rd Birthday Review

Posted by [ 2 years, 1 month ]

After nearly 10 years since Parasite Eve 2, the series reemerges in the form of The 3rd Birthday. Unfortunately, this title misses the mark more times than I can count.

3rd Birthday Could Have Been a Home Console Game

Posted by [ 2 years, 2 months ]

What would it have taken to make this a home console release? Read what the game’s director had to say.

New 3rd Birthday Screenshots and Trailer

Posted by [ 2 years, 2 months ]

Check out the latest menu screenshots and Overdrive trailer for The 3rd Birthday.

Parasite Eve Coming to NA PSN, New 3rd Birthday Trailer

Posted by [ 2 years, 2 months ]

Parasite Eve is coming to the North American PSN, not to mention an English 3rd Birthday launch trailer.

3rd Birthday Trailer has Story, Gameplay, Cinematics

Posted by [ 2 years, 3 months ]

The new trailer for Square Enix’s The 3rd Birthday is out, and it’s overflowing with

The 3rd Birthday Gets Release Date

Posted by [ 2 years, 3 months ]

March continues to gorge itself with more game releases, and you can add The 3rd Birthday to this smörgåsbord of titles. The game will also star a few big name actors in the first Parasite Eve game in over 10 years.

Watch: The 3rd Birthday Gameplay Trailer

Posted by [ 2 years, 5 months ]

Check the final trailer for The 3rd Birthday before it’s release in Japan next week. Trust me, you’ll want to see Aya Brea in a wedding dress.

The 3rd Birthday Review

Posted By about 2 years, 1 month ago

After nearly 10 years since Parasite Eve 2, the series reemerges in the form of The 3rd Birthday. Unfortunately, this title misses the mark more times than I can count.

3rd Birthday Could Have Been a Home Console Game

Posted By about 2 years, 2 months ago

What would it have taken to make this a home console release? Read what the game’s director had to say.

New 3rd Birthday Screenshots and Trailer

Posted By about 2 years, 2 months ago

Check out the latest menu screenshots and Overdrive trailer for The 3rd Birthday.

Parasite Eve Coming to NA PSN, New 3rd Birthday Trailer

Posted By about 2 years, 2 months ago

Parasite Eve is coming to the North American PSN, not to mention an English 3rd Birthday launch trailer.

3rd Birthday Trailer has Story, Gameplay, Cinematics

Posted By about 2 years, 3 months ago

The new trailer for Square Enix’s The 3rd Birthday is out, and it’s overflowing with

The 3rd Birthday Gets Release Date

Posted By about 2 years, 3 months ago

March continues to gorge itself with more game releases, and you can add The 3rd Birthday to this smörgåsbord of titles. The game will also star a few big name actors in the first Parasite Eve game in over 10 years.

Watch: The 3rd Birthday Gameplay Trailer

Posted By about 2 years, 5 months ago

Check the final trailer for The 3rd Birthday before it’s release in Japan next week. Trust me, you’ll want to see Aya Brea in a wedding dress.

The 3rd Birthday Review

The 3rd Birthday Review

After over 10 years since Parasite Eve 2, the series has reemerged in the form of The 3rd Birthday. Forgoing any elements that popularized the series in the PS1 days, this title misses the mark more times than I can count. I tend to look on the brighter side of things when it comes to reviewing games, but this is far and away the worst game I’ve ever reviewed during my time at Blistered Thumbs. What makes this game so disappointing and awful? Let’s dig in and find out.

PROS For a PSP game, this looks amazing. The Overdive mechanic is also quite fun.
CONS Confusing as hell story, poor level design, repetitive gameplay, and almost no connection to the other games in the series.
WTF?! SO. MUCH. FAN SERVICE.

The plot in this game deals with quite a few complicated elements, including time travel, the human soul, and alternate realities. The story had the potential to be pretty epic, however these elements are handled very sloppily. The main plot device is a new science called Overdive, which allows the user to travel back in time. Aya Brea uses this in order to defeat a new species wreaking havoc on New York called the Twisted. This is where the confusion begins.

Hey buddy, Billy Idol Called. He wants his suit back.

Aya Brea is the main character, but outside of a reason to make a new game, the story never really explains why. The Twisted don’t have anything to do with other creatures she’s encountered before, from what I gather. The reason for the Twisted even existing is so ridiculous you’ll do a double take wondering if what you just heard was true. You’re also lead to believe that the Overdive works one way, then the game decides to change its mind without explaining. You’re left so befuddled that at one point you just choose to accept confusion as inevitable.

Maybe the biggest sin of the game is how it has almost nothing to do with the other two Parasite Eve games. Outside of the inclusion of Aya and Dr. Maeda (the Japanese scientist), this could almost be an entirely different game. The other titles in the series had survival horror elements that made for some psychologically thrilling gameplay. The 3rd Birthday just seems like another dumb shooter with the PE name slapped on. I’m sorry to say, but if you’re a fan of the series, then you’ll be disappointed.

The gameplay doesn’t help matters much either. 3rd Birthday looks to try and appeal to a wider audience with it’s third-person shooter gameplay. Each level throws you into a series of corridors in frantic run-and-gun action. It’s actually quite fun to start off as it’s easy to shoot enemies with the lock-on mechanic. Trying out new guns makes things a little interesting as you buy and level them up. However, the game never really changes things up and gets boring really fast.

get used to killing these monsters. You’ll see them the whole game.

For the most part, each of the six levels have you running from room to room gunning down waves of monsters. You clear a room and move on to the next. The overall design is so lazy and boring. You’ll also be fighting the same enemies throughout the whole game. There are only about a dozen or so different types in total, not counting bosses. Speaking of bosses, they’re a joke. Half of them you have to fight twice in a row, no doubt in attempts to pad the play time. Considering the game has no extras or multiplayer, this is a rather cheap way to add gameplay time.

There are, however, a few things that the game does to mix things up a bit. In a few battles you take control of vehicles that are, admittedly, quite amusing. You can also customize your weapons and Aya’s DNA to give added stat boosts in battle. These two elements are rather shallow though, and you’ll most likely not spend a significant amount of time maximizing them. You also have a gauge that progressively builds up that, when used, gives Aya super-human abilities that allow her to move and shoot much faster. Of all the game’s short-comings, the Overdive mechanic does make for a bit of fun in battle.

5/10
  1. April 09, 2011 at 10:18pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    yeah well, its hard for me to say much. the 3rd birthday was my introduction into the series. im going around looking for the first and second parasite eve games to get a better understanding as to why this game doesnt seem to meet its standards. i did enjoy the3rd birthday however.

  2. April 07, 2011 at 09:37am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    So far i’m really liking it. However it is really repetitive though ‘:-/. Loving the cutscenes :-P

  3. April 07, 2011 at 02:49am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Shame… I was really looking forward to this.

  4. April 06, 2011 at 10:02pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Aww and a lot of people were really excited for this game too.

  5. April 06, 2011 at 09:10am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Awww…. I was really hoping this would be better…. Well at least Dissidia and Tactics Ogre were good.

  6. April 05, 2011 at 04:15pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Toriyama Motomu will now known as Toiletyama Motomu lol.
    Somebody needs to make a picture of Toriyama’s head replace by a toilet.

    • April 05, 2011 at 08:44pm
      In response to scottpilgramrule
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Ugh. Now you’re just trolling.

      • April 05, 2011 at 11:05pm
        In response to MinarX
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        Toriyama deserve every name calling, crtitcism and rants he needs for his sin.

        • April 05, 2011 at 11:26pm
          In response to scottpilgramrule
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

          That is the single worst pun I have ever heard spoken in earnest, please stop before you permanently damage the English language. Also, stop being such a drama queen, there’s a ton of people who dropped the ball over at SE, don’t go scapegoating like some kind of drunken lynch mob.

          • April 06, 2011 at 08:31am
            In response to axlryder
            VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

            Ditto, axlryder. I’m disappointed, too, but I’m not making poor potty puns. Oh, and I actually have played the game.

            On the brighter side, 3rd Birthday is bringing the older Parasite Eve games to PSN and gave me a code for Lightning to Cosplay as Aya in Dissidia. Nice asides, really.

            That said, I hardly think that we can say SE has crapped their pants. FF XIII’s only major flaw was uninspired level design choices, FF XIV was undoubtedly rushed, and, to be honest, a reboot like 3rd Birthday was always a long-shot to do right. That, and SE improved Dissidia…well, to be more correct, they didn’t break Dissidia by tweaking it….

  7. April 05, 2011 at 11:11am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Well axlryder, honestly i can’t say what changed… Unfortunately, Square-Enix doesn’t put their hidden gems on PSN… Sure, we can get Chrono Cross, FF VII, FF VIII, FF IX, and a few others, but Threads of Fate, Einhander, Bushido Blade 2, Tobal No. 2, and Brave Fencer Musashi aren’t available.

  8. April 05, 2011 at 01:44am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    btw mindjack has nothing to do with this game(similar concept I know!) but Toriyama needs to be rant and expose so that everybody included spoony will know why square enix suck these days.

  9. April 04, 2011 at 11:19pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Well, all things considered I’m really not surprised.

    Or should I say I wasn’t surprised, seeing how I bought the thing. 3rd Birthday unmistakably had potential, but poor writing and skimpy clothing make for good porno, not good games. For the record, I like the game well enough, but I understand that my tastes are somewhere out in the left-field bleachers, seeing how I actively like that black sheep that is called FFXIII….

    All I can say is that, as soon as I got out of the tutorial, I went to the hub and read the background file on Aya. Something akin to “Blood blooming on her wedding dress” was on a file listed as an official record. That there is D- writing that most fan-fiction authors would be ashamed of; NO REPUTABLE AGENCY ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH WOULD WRITE AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT THAT WAY. The hack of a writer copy-and-pasted text from a brainstorming session onto the game’s text.

    Now, in its defense, the gameplay is quite smooth and enjoyable–although there is far far FAR too much ammo for survival horror–and the twisted are some of the most memorable enemies I’ve played in recent memory. That said, in the past fighting games have been the brainless and RPGs tell the stories, and this time we see Duodecim come up with a surprisingly bittersweet–albeit far too short–story while 3rd Birthday degenerates into mindless fanservice.

    Once again, I like the game well enough and don’t regret buying it. But it shouldn’t have been like this. 5 is a touch harsh, but the game is unmistakably, irrevocably, unforgivably average.

  10. April 04, 2011 at 10:22pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I have this game on it’s way from Amazon and it honestly looks really fun. I may be wrong, but I’ve already bought it.

    About the story, they’re trying to not alienate any gamers who want to play this new game, but don’t have the resources to play the first two games.

    Also, if you look at the top of the page, it says that HexaDrive developed the game. Square only published it. So, either Blistered Thumbs needs to get their information right or everyone needs to stop bitching and moaning about how it’s all Square’s fault. Okay?

  11. April 04, 2011 at 06:13pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Let me tell you why this game’s story suck. It was written by the devil himself-Toriyama Motomu.
    He’s everything what’s wrong with Square today. He create that shitty FFX-2 which drives spoony fucking insane, he create the fucking FF13 which story suck, not to mention he’s also a sexist. He also manage to destroy Frontline: Mission Evolve(another square enix game.)
    He needs stop and fired before parasite eve gone batshit insane.

    BTW I recommand Spoonyone rant on this Toriyama Motomu guy if he wants to make a FFX-2 review series, that would be hilarious lol.

    • April 04, 2011 at 07:13pm
      In response to scottpilgramrule
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

      Just as I thought, there’s still some Toriyama fanboy thumbs down my comment for hating FFX-2 and FFXIII.

      • April 05, 2011 at 10:55am
        In response to scottpilgramrule
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        I really hate your attitude towards a guy who tries his best to make a really good game. Just because Spoony doesn’t like the games doesn’t necessarily mean that they are bad games.
        Also how is it that it’s Toriyamas fault that Front Mission Evolved failed? If your going to blame it on anyone blame the one who chose DoubleHelix (G.I Joe) to make their game.

        • April 05, 2011 at 01:20pm
          In response to MinarX
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

          You can honestly say, straight faced, you think Toriyama tries to make good games? Yeah the Spoony worship is stupid but those two games suck all on their own regardless of what a certain internet personality thinks and I’m one of those sick people that actually enjoys X-2 on a certain level.

          Also, the people defending SE saying they only published it, really? Square own’s the rights to the Parasite Eve title, they happily slapped it on a crap game cause it had some name recognition. Their sin is just as bad, if not worse, than Hexadrive. So yes, if their label is on it, its just another shit game brought to us by Square Enix.

        • April 05, 2011 at 04:12pm
          In response to MinarX
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

          I’m not a spoony fanboy, but spoony is right about how final fantasy suck.
          And Toriyama should’ve quit right after FFX-2 because it just show him has no talent at writting at all.
          Don’t you dare try to defend that monster again.

    • April 06, 2011 at 08:38pm
      In response to scottpilgramrule
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Not to mention the ending suck and it turns out you are actually playing as Eve this whole time, which also means you are staring a woman who has a mind of 13 years old little girl with the body of 20 years old in shower.
      By now, the only consumer for this games are pedo priest, otaku, sexist and Toriyama fanboy.

  12. April 04, 2011 at 05:51pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I don’t think this game deserves that low of a score, but it is your opinion. i just don’t agree with it

  13. April 04, 2011 at 04:00pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I can explain a little more on why this game’s story is absolutely terrible. You see the original Parasite Eve for the PS1 was the sequel to a book also called Parasite Eve by Hideki Sena (I hope that is right) and the second also followed up on both the book and game. Well after 11 years Square Enix lost all rights to make any games that had anything to do with the Parasite Eve novel hence the reason this game is called The 3rd Birthday and not Parasite Eve 3. So in order to make this game they had to forgo any aspects having to do with the previous games and novel they were based on hence why the enemies are called the Twisted instead of being mitochondrial monsters and other such things however Square did manage to hang on to the name and character likeness of Aya Brea and that is pretty much it the rest is pretty much this

    • April 06, 2011 at 09:56am
      In response to wolffster25
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      It is true that Parasite Eve does draw from the book of the same name… However, it actually draws more from the film that was based off the book than the book iteslf…. and yes, Square did take liberties in the story for the first game.

      • April 06, 2011 at 12:57pm
        In response to Ceadda1220
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        Hmmmm I didn’t know that well you learn something new every day thanks I just kinda wish Square would stop making ridiculous plots and having brilliant graphics. Why not go back to basics? Although I honestly doubt that they will do that. Still I can’t help but feel really worried for Squeenix they are shadow of what they once were.

  14. April 04, 2011 at 03:47pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I was going to mention the Mindjack thing myself until Ceadda1220 did. It kinda pisses me off when someone blames a publisher for a game. Square-Enix is a huge company that owns several developers, hell even the in-house team is huge enough that there could possibly be zero crossover between the people who made FFXIII, 3rd Birthday, and FFXIV. I haven’t played this game, though, so I can’t judge it, but I didn’t think Famitsu would lie to us considering they have been a good judge in the past. Regardless I wasn’t gonna buy this game anyway, I’ll leave it up to my brother to decide.

  15. April 04, 2011 at 03:34pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    I really hope you made the same typo several times throughout this review… I won’t deny your opinions on the game itself throughout, to each there own, but, The Third Birthday has tons of extra’s.

    Achievement style feats for every mission
    The obligatory music player and video player
    several secret guns and special costumes rewarded for difficulty, feat completion, or number of completions
    several cheat codes (many of which that actually make the game HARDER, for those who like a challenge) also rewarded for difficulty, feat completion, or number of completions

    If you truly believe there are no extra’s in TTB, then i sincerely hope you brought enough pot to share with the class.

    PS. Aya’s cloth’s deteriorate during battle as you get hit, showing battle damage. As your cloths deteriorate, the protection they provide go’s down. This is the reason behind the visible damage to your costume.

  16. April 04, 2011 at 02:34pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    It’s amazing how both different and similar the reviews are on IGN and Gametrailers. Both reviews name the same weaknesses of The 3rd Birthday, but while GT rips the game a new asshole, the IGN reviewer just shrugs and dismisses the weaknesses. For example, the IGN reviewer said that the English dialogue is a “straight interpretation of the Japanese”; the GT reviewer said it is “cringe-worthy.”

    IGN score: 8.5 [GREAT]

    Gametrailers score: 5.4 [POOR]

    Sorry if this comment seems like a blog, but I couldn’t help but get the feeling that IGN is biased (I know, big news, right?). Let’s just hope that Taylor here won’t succumb to the temptation of tens of millions of dollars and vacation packages in exchange for positive reviews for shitty games!!!

    • April 04, 2011 at 03:13pm
      In response to Eyeshot
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Game Trailers’ review was spot on. Enough said.

      • April 05, 2011 at 06:05am
        In response to Taylor H.
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        Actually, Taylor, wouldn’t the GT review be too negative based on your assessment of the game? 7-7.5 being average is the general standard in reviewing games, so wouldn’t that make the IGN reviewer too positive and the GT reviewer too negative? After all, GT basically said the game sucks and is worthless (or at least, that’s what most gamers think when they see a 5 in a review).

        • April 05, 2011 at 02:35pm
          In response to axlryder
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

          Their score might have been a tad low, but I pretty much agree with everything they had to say about the game. When watching or reading reviews, I don’t just look at the final score, I actually like to read or listen to what they had to say about the game.

    • April 04, 2011 at 05:12pm
      In response to Eyeshot
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

      Yeah, you’re gonna find that ALL publications and sites are biased depending on the games. GT gave Kain and lynch 2 an 84/100 but gave sonic colors a 64/100. Every time I’ve looked up one of their reviews I’ve seen them review quirky jrpgs like the stuff NIS puts out as poor, regardless of quality, and laud over every FPS that falls into their hands. I’ll never listen to another GT review again, but that’s simply because I’ve seen more of their bias firsthand. I’m sure other sites are equally bad, but I just haven’t noticed as much.

  17. April 04, 2011 at 01:45pm
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Well, what can you expect from the people who brought us Mindjack?

  18. April 04, 2011 at 11:38am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Bro, a 5/10 means average, not bad. You got that wrong.

    • April 04, 2011 at 12:44pm
      In response to Flow72
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Yeah, I thought BT uses a REAL point system. Like Flow said 5/10 is average.

      • April 04, 2011 at 02:56pm
        In response to Phoenix210
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        “The overall package is very average. The production value is high; the cinematics and graphics look great. The game actually functions properly and there is a bit of fun to be had. For the most part though, the game is just boring, repetitive, and uninspired. I would have given it a lower score if it was a complete train wreck, but it wasn’t.”

        That sounds like a 5 that people shouldn’t buy. The 1-10 is the quality indicator, i.e. how well the game is made. The “Avoid it” “buy it now” etc is what you should do with your money.

        Taylor’s review reflects the score he gave it.

        • April 04, 2011 at 07:55pm
          In response to Micah C.
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

          Ah, ok, got it. So you can give a 10/10 when it’s good quality but the price is … say 2000$ it’s still an “Avoid it”.

          • April 04, 2011 at 08:12pm
            In response to Phoenix210
            VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

            Precisely! Or the game could be really well made all around, but maybe it just isn’t fun to play.

  19. April 04, 2011 at 11:11am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    you know, I’m sick of people hating on this game for fanservice, as if the first two didn’t do it, Aya always wore skimpy and revealing clothes in the previous games and she had a shower scene that you didn’t even need to unlock in the second one, so the fact that people are only going nuts over fanservice NOW is really ridiculous.

    And you know what other thing about Parasite Eve games that was there in the first games too? THEY ALWAYS HAD CONFUSING STORYLINES!! You always had to play them 2-3 times to figure it out properly.

    One thing I agree about is the repetitive gameplay and that fans of the series don’t need to buy the game, nor should people buy a PSP just to play it.

    I’d add that since this is on the PSP, expect your fingers to break if you’re gonna play it, and it’s kinda short (7-10 hours only). Oh, and Maeda now sounds like a creepy molester, but I blame localization for that since he sounds much better in the Japanese Version.

    All in all, this game gets a 7/10 from me.

  20. April 04, 2011 at 11:08am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Not that I really mind/care/disagree but queue up the “Another shit game from Square-Enix” comment roll.

  21. April 04, 2011 at 10:58am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Well, I could buy a psp, buy this game, play it, beat it, beat it 50 more times and get a chance to see Aya naked in the shower, oooooor I could google.

    *googles*

    just saved myself 140 bucks and 500 hours. Gotta admit though, I can see there was a lot of *cough* loving care that went into crafting that particular scene

  22. April 04, 2011 at 10:56am
    In response to Article
    VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    The worst game you’ve ever reviewed and you still give it a 5/10?
    Woah…

    But with games like this one it really doesn’t surprise me, why Square-Enix has become the Charlie Sheen of game puplishing lately.

    • April 04, 2011 at 12:37pm
      In response to Ductos
      VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

      Ouch. Comparing Square-Enix to Charlie Sheen. That’s a bit harsh on Charlie, don’t you think?

      • April 04, 2011 at 01:07pm
        In response to Carteeg_Struve
        VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

        I don’t think so.

        Games like MindJack and Final Fantasy XIV clearly indicate:
        They need help.
        And so does Sheen for his…well, escapades.

        For their own good, I really hope Deus Ex 3 won’t suck.

        • April 04, 2011 at 01:14pm
          In response to Ductos
          VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

          Actually, Sqaure-Enix didn’t develop Mindjack, they merely published it… as for FF XIV, i honestly couldn’t tell you since i haven’t played a final fantasy game in quite some time… unfortunately in this day and age, rampant fanboyish expectations on games in a series dilute the ability of the developer to branch out… Sure, Square-Enix has some offal titles under its belt like ‘The Bouncer’ and ‘Ehrgeiz’, but we tend to look at these ‘crap games’ with more scrutiny than a good unknown title like ‘Einhander’ or ‘Threads of Fate’…

          • April 04, 2011 at 04:56pm
            In response to Ceadda1220
            VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

            Aww man, I love me some threads of fate. If their was ever I game I’d want to see an out of left field sequel for, that would be it. Actually, square put out so much good shit in the 90′s it’s crazy. So did Enix for that matter. WHAT CHANGED!?

          • April 05, 2011 at 01:34pm
            In response to Ceadda1220
            VN:F [1.9.21_1169]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

            That makes no sense. The Bouncer and Ehrgeiz were just as obscure as Einhander and Threads of Fate. Good games get put under the microscope just as much as bad ones, probably more so because there’s people desperately looking for flaws. Look at how Final Fantasy 7 went from, according to the case cover, “…quite possibly the greatest game ever made” to everyone shitting on it for every last little thing that they can find?

            Also, clearly fan expectations have not stopped Square Enix from branching out considering how drastically different one incarnation of a certain series was from the last. If anything, them branching out and working toward mass appeal has been the cause of their overall decline in quality since they need to farm out their IP to third party developers (3rd Birthday and FF14 just being the most recent examples) and they keep mashing together game elements in order to appeal to more “types” of gamer . Specialization and refinement are the keys to high quality product.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

No Posts

No Posts